Lecture 11 - Safety Claims and Free Speech: Preemption and Defamation
recorded by: Yale University
published: April 29, 2012, recorded: February 2010, views: 2325
released under terms of: Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives (CC-BY-ND)
Download yaleevst255s2010_wargo_lec11_01.mp4 (Video - generic video source 529.4 MB)
Download yaleevst255s2010_wargo_lec11_01.flv (Video 229.0 MB)
Download yaleevst255s2010_wargo_lec11_01_640x360_h264.mp4 (Video 137.2 MB)
Download yaleevst255s2010_wargo_lec11_01.wmv (Video 207.2 MB)
Report a problem or upload filesIf you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
This lecture presents three cases: Bates v. Dow, a lawsuit brought by peanut growers against the producers of a pesticide that degraded their soil; the Alar case, in which environmental organizations and the media successfully pressured EPA to ban a carcinogenic pesticide used on apples; and the Texas Cattlemen's Association's lawsuit against Oprah Winfrey for her coverage of Mad Cow Disease. Using these three cases, Professor Wargo discusses the legal concepts of preemption and defamation. He gives an overview of their origin and use in regulating agriculture and protecting human health and the environment. Through the Texas Cattlemen's Association case, he shows the effect of state "veggie libel" laws on free speech.
Link this pageWould you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !