Career Chances of Women in Nanosciences in European Universities – Conditions for International Diversity
Description
The lecture will place two different questions in the centre: * What are the reasons for gender inequality in relation to the chances to become a University professor in Nanosciences? * How can cross-national differences with respect to the share of women in University career positions in this field be explained? The paper combines a cultural and an institutional perspective. It is argued that institutions like the University are based on, and reproduce, expectations towards the behaviour of individuals. In many European Universities, particularly also in Western Europe, the traditional expectations in relation to the main qualifications and the behaviour of an University professor were traditionally mainly also based on two cultural constructions: * on the image of the male breadwinner who is comprehensively available for his profession, while another person takes over the organisation of his everyday life, as well as housework and childcare; * on a ‘male ‘habitus (according to Bourdieu 1987): this means, that specific qualities that the professor is expected to have are in society defined as ‘male’ qualities. However, together with a fundamental change of European universities in the last fifteen years that can be called an ‘economisation’ of Universities, also the cultural ideal of the University professor, and the expectations which are connected with this position, have in part fundamentally changed. Such change has in part already started earlier in East European countries than in the West. It is argued here that this development has opened new options for women for a University career. However, there are considerable cross-national differences with respect to the chances for women to make a University career in Nanosciences. It is argued that particularly also some cultural factors contribute to explaining such differences: the respective cultural model of the University professor in a society , the societal esteem that is connected with this position, and the way in which “care” is constructed in the dominant cultural model of the family.
| Slides | |
| 0:00 | Career Chances of Women in Nanoscience – Conditions for International Diversity |
| 1:22 | Gender Segregation within Science |
| 3:09 | Vertical Gender Segregation: Development of the Share of M en and Women During the Academic Career |
| 3:34 | Cross-National Differences |
| 4:10 | Proportion of Female Grade A Staff to Total Staff in Natural Science |
| 4:30 | Central Questions of This Presentation |
| 4:52 | How Can Cross-National Differences in the Gender Segregation within Natural Science Be Explained? |
| 4:54 | Conditions That Might Explain Cross-National Differences |
| 7:16 | Family Policies as Explanatory Factor? |
| 7:21 | Proportion of Female Grade A Staff in Natural Science - 1 |
| 8:31 | Cultural Factors as Explanatory Factor? - 1 |
| 8:57 | Proportion of Female Grade A Staff in Natural Science - 2 |
| 10:32 | Cultural Factors as Explanatory Factor? - 2 |
| 11:06 | Proportion of Female Grade A Staff in Natural Science - 3 |
| 12:45 | Structural Factors of the Academic System as Explanatory Factor? |
| 14:03 | Expenditure on Research per Researcher |
| 15:11 | Findngs in Relation to Structural Factors |
| 17:28 | Conclusion in Relation to the Explanation of Cross-National Differences in Women‘s Career Chances in Natural Science |
| 18:25 | How Do Career Structures of Women in Nanoscience Differ in a Cross-National Perspective? |
| 18:52 | On-Line Survey on Women in Nanoscience in Europe at the University of Hamburg, 2007/2008 |
| 20:56 | Description of the Sample |
| 22:27 | Current Position by Age in Years |
| 23:16 | Current Position by Region |
| 23:35 | Current Position by Family Status |
| 24:07 | Type of Contract |
| 24:30 | Recruitment for Current Position |
| 25:42 | Salary by Regions |
| 26:18 | Active Support of Career by the Employing Institute by Region |
| 27:09 | Family-Employment Balance by Region |
| 27:41 | Perceived Gender Differences that Are Requested in Relation to Professional Competences by Region |
| 28:14 | Conclusion: Career Structures and Chances of Women in Nanoscience |
| 29:26 | End |
Lecture rating
| People found this lecture: | ||
| Worth seeing | ||
| because it is: | ||
| Valuable and informative | ||
| Well presented | ||
| Easily understandable | ||
| Acceptably recorded | ||
| You need to login to cast your vote. | ||
Report a problem or upload files
If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Related content
SEE ALSO:
Link this page
Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !


