Social-media blog tagging: Metadata or “just more content” ?
published: April 10, 2007, recorded: April 2007, views: 5941
Report a problem or upload filesIf you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
The authoring of tags -- unlike the authoring of traditional metadata -- is highly popular among users. This harbours unprecedented opportunities for organizing content. However, tags are still poorly understood. What do they ''mean'', in what senses are they similar to or different from metadata? Different tags support different communities, but how exactly do they reflect the plurality of opinions,what is the relation to individual differences in authoring and reading? In this paper, we offer a definition and empirical evidence for the claim that ''tags are not metadata, but just more content''. The analysis rests on a multi-annotator classification of a blog corpus using the WordNet domain labels system (WND), the development of a system of text-classification methods using WordNet and WND, and a quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis of these classifications. We argue that the notion of a ''gold standard'' may be meaningless in social media, and we outline possible consequences for labelling and search-engine development.
Link this pageWould you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !