PhD Thesis Defense: Dynamics of large networks
Description
A basic premise behind the study of large networks is that interaction leads to complex
collective behavior. In our work we found very interesting and counterintuitive patterns for
time evolving networks, which change some of the basic assumptions that were made in the
past. We then develop models that explain processes which govern the network evolution,
fit such models to real networks, and use them to generate realistic graphs or give formal
explanations about their properties. In addition, our work has a wide range of applications:
it can help us spot anomalous graphs and outliers, forecast future graph structure and run
simulations of network evolution. Another important aspect of our research is the study of “local” patterns and structures
of propagation in networks. We aim to identify building blocks of the networks and find
the patterns of influence that these blocks have on information or virus propagation over the
network. Our recent work included the study of the spread of influence in a large personto-
person product recommendation network and its effect on purchases. We also model the
propagation of information on the blogosphere, and propose algorithms to efficiently find
influential nodes in the network. A central topic of our thesis is also the analysis of large datasets as certain network properties
only emerge and thus become visible when dealing with lots of data. We analyze the
world’s social and communication network of Microsoft Instant Messenger with 240 million
people and 255 billion conversations. We also made interesting and counterintuitive observations
about network community structure that suggest that only small network clusters exist,
and that they merge and vanish as they grow.
| Slides | |
| 0:00 | Dynamics of large networks |
| 0:59 | Web: Rich data |
| 2:08 | Rich data: Networks |
| 2:50 | Networks. What do we know? |
| 3:46 | This thesis: Network dynamics |
| 4:38 | This thesis. The structure (1) |
| 5:17 | This thesis. The structure (2) |
| 5:20 | Background: Network models |
| 6:49 | Q1) Network evolution (1) |
| 7:52 | Q1) Network evolution (2) |
| 8:43 | Q2) Modeling edge attachment |
| 8:46 | Q1) Network evolution (2) |
| 8:52 | Q2) Modeling edge attachment |
| 10:06 | Setting: Edge-by-edge evolution |
| 11:25 | Edge attachment degree bias |
| 12:44 | But, edges also attach locally |
| 14:20 | How to best close a triangle? |
| 16:13 | Q3) Generating realistic graphs |
| 17:32 | Q3) The model: Kronecker graphs |
| 19:03 | Q5) Kronecker graphs: Estimation |
| 21:04 | Estimation: Epinions (N=76k, E=510k) |
| 21:58 | Thesis: The structure (1) |
| 22:13 | Thesis: The structure (2) |
| 22:14 | Part 2. Diffusion and Cascades |
| 23:24 | Settting 1: Viral marketing |
| 24:19 | Setting 2: Blogosphere |
| 25:17 | Q4) What do cascades look like? |
| 27:05 | Q5) Human adoption curves |
| 28:09 | Q5) Adoption curve: Validation |
| 28:52 | Q6) Cascade & outbreak detection |
| 29:47 | Q6) The problem: Detecting cascades |
| 30:10 | Two parts to the problem |
| 31:05 | Optimization problem |
| 31:38 | Solution: CELF Algorithm |
| 32:11 | Problem structure: Submodularity |
| 33:17 | Blogs: Information epidemics (1) |
| 34:18 | Blogs: Information epidemics (2) |
| 34:47 | CELF: Scalability |
| 35:15 | Same problem: Water Network |
| 35:55 | Water network: Results |
| 36:31 | Thesis: The structure (3) |
| 36:53 | Thesis: The structure (4) |
| 36:54 | 3 case studies on large data |
| 37:34 | Q7) Planetary look on small-world |
| 40:06 | Q8) Network community structure |
| 41:09 | Example: Small network |
| 42:03 | Example: Large network |
| 42:41 | Q8) Suggested network structure (1) |
| 43:39 | Q8) Suggested network structure (2) |
| 44:29 | Q9) Web projections |
| 45:36 | Q9) Web projections: Results |
| 46:49 | Thesis: The structure (5) |
| 47:05 | Future directions: Evolution |
| 48:31 | Future directions: Diffusion |
| 49:33 | What's next? |
| 50:32 | Thesis: The structure (5) |
Lecture rating
| People found this lecture: | ||
| Worth seeing | ||
| because it is: | ||
| Valuable and informative | ||
| Well presented | ||
| Easily understandable | ||
| Acceptably recorded | ||
| You need to login to cast your vote. | ||
Report a problem or upload files
If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
SEE ALSO:
Link this page
Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !






Jure Leskovec, zagovor diplome
thanks for this paper
mehrdad heydari form Iran =computer science student