Evolution of protein complexes and protein interaction networks
Description
There is an abundance of data on protein interactions and protein complexes, both
from conventional smallscale
experiments collected over the decades, including
threedimensional
structures, and more recently by largescale
functional genomics
experiments. We can now draw on the information available about protein
interactions in order to study the evolution of interactions. We have shown that
interactions, just like individual proteins, frequently emerge by duplication and
divergence. The duplication of a protein that engages in proteinprotein
interactions
raises issues about the stoichiometry and equilibrium of protein complexes when the
quantity of one component increases. Nevertheless, our results indicate that most
interactions and complexes have evolved by stepwise
duplications of individual
proteins engaged in interactions. We show that duplicated complexes retain the same
overall function, but have different binding specificities and regulation, revealing that
duplication is associated with functional specialization[1,2].
From analysis of crystal structures of proteins as well as the domain
architectures of multidomain
proteins, it is clear that physical interactions between
identical or homologous domainsand protein chains are extremely common [3,4].
How have this particular class of interactions evolved, and
| Slides | |
| 0:00 | Evolution of Protein Interactions in Networks and Complexes |
| 2:13 | The question: How do protein interactions evolve? - part 1 |
| 3:05 | The question: How do protein interactions evolve? - part 2 |
| 5:42 | The question: How do protein interactions evolve? - part 3 |
| 5:56 | Frequency in protein interaction networks? |
| 7:23 | Frequency in protein interaction networks? |
| 8:17 | Frequency in protein interaction networks? |
| 8:29 | Outline - part 1 |
| 8:54 | Outline - part 2 |
| 9:45 | Echo and Narcissus |
| 10:02 | How frequent are homo-oligomers? |
| 12:38 | Selective advantages of homo-oligomers |
| 16:16 | 3Dcomplex.org - a hierarchical classification of complexes |
| 19:20 | Abrief reminder of symmetry |
| 22:17 | Evolutionary pathways of complex assembly |
| 24:57 | Symmetries found in a non-redundant set of ~2500 complexes - part 1 |
| 25:52 | Symmetries found in a non-redundant set of ~2500 complexes - part 2 |
| 26:13 | Evolutionary pathways of complex assembly |
| 26:16 | Outline |
| 26:24 | Conservation of Quaternary Structure -Examples |
| 27:29 | Conservation of Quaternary Structure |
| 29:00 | Model of homomer evolution |
| 29:56 | Homology to the largest interface is common |
| 31:32 | An evolutionary relic |
| 32:00 | Predictions based on largest interface |
| 32:33 | A hypothesis: evolution predicts assembly pathway? |
| 35:30 | Outline |
| 35:46 | Macromolecular mass spectrometry (E.B. Erba & C.V. Robinson) |
| 37:19 | Complexes with characterised assembly pathways -agreement with predictions |
| 38:34 | Outline - Interface size and geometry as unifying principle |
| 41:10 | Summary |
| 41:56 | Acknowledgements |
| 44:43 | - Qustions |
Lecture rating
| People found this lecture: | ||
| Worth seeing | ||
| because it is: | ||
| Valuable and informative | ||
| Well presented | ||
| Easily understandable | ||
| Acceptably recorded | ||
| You need to login to cast your vote. | ||
Report a problem or upload files
If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Related content
Link this page
Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !




This comment part obscures the view of the web page and the slides in windows explorer! can you put it out of the way?