Near-Optimal MAP Inference for Determinantal Point Processes

author: Jennifer A. Gillenwater, University of Pennsylvania
published: Jan. 16, 2013,   recorded: December 2012,   views: 363
Categories
You might be experiencing some problems with Your Video player.

Slides

Slides
0:00 Near-Optimal Map Inference for Determinantal Point Processes
0:08 Image Search: “Jaguar”
0:28 Task: Subset Selection
0:42 Matched Summarization (1)
0:59 Matched Summarization (2)
1:24 Quality only
1:44 Quality + diversity
2:00 Formalizing (1)
2:24 Formalizing (2)
2:41 Formalizing (3)
2:51 Area as a Det (1)
3:07 Area as a Det (2)
3:12 Volume as a Det (1)
4:01 Volume as a Det (2)
4:06 Volume as a Det (3)
4:09 DPP Inference (1)
4:46 DPP Inference (2)
4:52 DPP Inference (3)
5:04 DPP Inference (4)
5:15 DPP Inference (5)
5:31 Submodularity to the Rescue (1)
5:55 Submodularity to the Rescue (2)
6:37 Submodularity to the Rescue (3)
7:01 Submodularity to the Rescue (4)
7:17 Monotonicity
7:48 Prior Work (1)
8:27 Prior Work (2)
8:39 Image Comparison with Constraints (1)
8:53 Image Comparison with Constraints (2)
9:12 Image Comparison with Constraints (3)
9:44 Chekuri et al. 2011 (1)
10:13 Chekuri et al. 2011 (2)
10:33 Chekuri et al. 2011 (3)
10:37 Chekuri et al. 2011 (4)
10:41 Chekuri et al. 2011 (5)
10:56 Chekuri et al. 2011 (6)
11:05 Softmax Extension (1)
11:21 Softmax Extension (2)
11:34 Softmax Extension (3)
11:39 Softmax Extension (4)
11:44 Softmax Extension (5)
12:06 Softmax Extension (6)
12:34 Concave in all-positive/all-negative directions
12:49 Not necessarily concave in other directions
12:57 Approximation Guarantee
13:36 Baseline
13:47 Synthetic Experiments
13:55 Effectiveness eval
14:33 Efficiency eval (1)
15:03 Efficiency eval (2)
15:29 Matched Summarization (1)
15:53 Matched Summarization (2)
15:59 Matched Summarization (3)
16:29 Matched Summarization (4)
17:08 Matched summary
17:34 Performance
17:53 Summary (1)
18:18 Summary (1)

Related content

Report a problem or upload files

If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Lecture popularity: You need to login to cast your vote.
 
    Delicious Bibliography

Description

Determinantal point processes (DPPs) have recently been proposed as computationally efficient probabilistic models of diverse sets for a variety of applications, including document summarization, image search, and pose estimation. Many DPP inference operations, including normalization and sampling, are tractable; however, finding the most likely configuration (MAP), which is often required in practice for decoding, is NP-hard, so we must resort to approximate inference. Because DPP probabilities are log-submodular, greedy algorithms have been used in the past with some empirical success; however, these methods only give approximation guarantees in the special case of DPPs with monotone kernels. In this paper we propose a new algorithm for approximating the MAP problem based on continuous techniques for submodular function maximization. Our method involves a novel continuous relaxation of the log-probability function, which, in contrast to the multilinear extension used for general submodular functions, can be evaluated and differentiated exactly and efficiently. We obtain a practical algorithm with a 1/4-approximation guarantee for a general class of non-monotone DPPs. Our algorithm also extends to MAP inference under complex polytope constraints, making it possible to combine DPPs with Markov random fields, weighted matchings, and other models. We demonstrate that our approach outperforms greedy methods on both synthetic and real-world data.

Link this page

Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !

Write your own review or comment:

make sure you have javascript enabled or clear this field: