Learning About Sensorimotor Data
published: Jan. 25, 2012, recorded: December 2011, views: 5876
Report a problem or upload filesIf you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Temporal-difference (TD) learning of reward predictions underlies both reinforcement-learning algorithms and the standard dopamine model of reward-based learning in the brain. This confluence of computational and neuroscientific ideas is perhaps the most successful since the Hebb synapse. Can it be extended beyond reward? The brain certainly predicts many things other than reward---such as in a forward model of the consequences of various ways of behaving---and TD methods can be used to make these predictions. The idea and advantages of using TD methods to learn large numbers of predictions about many states and stimuli, in parallel, have been apparent since the 1990s, but technical issues have prevented this vision from being practically implemented...until now. A key breakthrough was the development of a new family of gradient-TD methods, introduced at NIPS in 2008 (by Maei, Szepesvari, and myself). Using these methods, and other ideas, we are now able to learn thousands of non-reward predictions in real-time at 10Hz from a single sensorimotor data stream from a physical robot. These predictions are temporally extended (ranging up to tens of seconds of anticipation), goal oriented, and policy contingent. The new algorithms enable learning to be off-policy and in parallel, resulting in dramatic increases in the amount that can be learned in a given amount of time. Our effective learning rate scales linearly with computational resources. On a consumer laptop we can learn thousands of predictions in real-time. On a larger computer, or on a comparable laptop in a few years, the same methods could learn millions of meaningful predictions about different alternate ways of behaving. These predictions in aggregate constitute a rich detailed model of the world that can support planning methods such as approximate dynamic programming.
Link this pageWould you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !