event thumbnail image
The 13th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Distributed Classification in Peer-to-Peer Networks

author: Ping Luo, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Description

This work studies the problem of distributed classification in peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. While there has been a significant amount of work in distributed classification, most of existing algorithms are not designed for P2P networks. Indeed, as server-less and router-less systems, P2P networks impose several challenges for distributed classification: (1) it is not practical to have global synchronization in large- scale P2P networks; (2) there are frequent topology changes caused by frequent failure and recovery of peers; and (3) there are frequent on-the-fly data updates on each peer. In this paper, we propose an ensemble paradigm for distributed classification in P2P networks. Under this paradigm, each peer builds its local classifiers on the local data and the results from all local classifiers are then combined by plurality voting. To build local classifiers, we adopt the learning algorithm of pasting bites to generate multiple local classifiers on each peer based on the local data. To combine local results, we propose a general form of Distributed Plurality Voting (DPV ) protocol in dynamic P2P networks. This protocol keeps the single-site validity for dynamic networks, and supports the computing modes of both one-shot query and continuous monitoring. We theoretically prove that the condition C0 for sending messages used in DPV0 is locally communication-optimal to achieve the above properties. Finally, experimental results on real-world P2P networks show that: (1) the proposed ensemble paradigm is effective even if there are thousands of local classifiers; (2) in most cases, the DPV0 algorithm is local in the sense that voting is processed using information gathered from a very small vicinity, whose size is independent of the network size; (3) DPV0 is significantly more communication-efficient than existing algorithms for distributed plurality voting.

You might be experiencing some problems with Your Video player.
Slides
0:00 Distributed Classification in Peer-to-Peer Networks
0:19 Overview-part01
0:57 Research Motivation
2:21 Research Motivation (2)
3:24 Problem Formulation
4:13 Our Contributions
5:10 Overview-part02
5:13 Building Local Classifiers
6:11 Overview-part03
6:14 Problem Formulation Of DPV
7:14 An Example Of DPV
7:37 Comparison Between DPV and Distributed Majority Voting (DMV, by Wolff et al. [TSMC’04])
9:06 Comparison Between DPV and DMV (2)
10:14 Challenges for DPV
10:44 DPV Protocol Overview
12:08 The Condition for Sending Messages
13:37 The Condition for Sending Messages (2)
14:12 The Correctness of DPV Protocol
15:05 The Optimality of DPV Protocol
16:23 The Extension of DPV Protocol
17:36 Overview-part04
17:39 Accuracy of P2P Classification
18:55 The Performance of DPV Protocol
19:28 The Performance of DPV Protocol (2)
19:55 The Performance of DPV Protocol (3)
20:17 The Performance of DPV Protocol (4)
21:33 Overview-part05
21:36 Related Work - Ensemble Classifiers
21:52 Related Work - P2P Data Mining
23:07 Overview-part06
23:09 Summary
23:44 Q. & A.

Lecture rating

People found this lecture:
Worth seeing
because it is:
 Valuable and informative
Well presented
Easily understandable
Acceptably recorded
You need to login to cast your vote.

Report a problem or upload files

If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.

Link this page

Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !

Write your own review or comment: