An OWL 2 Far?
author:
Stefan Decker,
DERI Galway, National University of Ireland, Galway
author: Michel Dumontier, Carleton University
author: Tim Finin, University of Maryland
author: Ian Horrocks, University of Oxford
chairman: Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Bell Labs, Alcatel-Lucent
author: Michel Dumontier, Carleton University
author: Tim Finin, University of Maryland
author: Ian Horrocks, University of Oxford
chairman: Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Bell Labs, Alcatel-Lucent
Description
The definition of OWL, the ontology language underlying the Semantic Web, is based on formal representation methods. This provides benefits, in that tools have a firm definition of what they are supposed to do, but can have problems, due to difficulty or expense of building tools or mismatch with needs. The panel will discuss whether the general idea of designing standard Semantic Web languages with steadily increasing power (e.g., the progression from RDF to RDFS to OWL to OWL 2 to …) all based on formal methods is the right way to support the Semantic Web. What level of expressive power does the Semantic Web need? How should standard Semantic Web languages be designed? Does the Semantic Web even need formality?
You might be experiencing some problems with Your Video player.
| Slides | |
| 0:00 | Who the hell needs description logics anyway? |
| 3:04 | Who the hell needs description logics anyway? |
| 3:26 | Real People (not AI Researchers) have real problems! |
| 4:00 | Description Logics – Axioms about the world (1) |
| 4:21 | Description Logics – Axioms about the world (2) |
| 4:38 | Description Logics – Axioms about the world (3) |
| 5:02 | About missing Boats... |
| 8:54 | An OWL 2 Far? ISWC2008 Panel |
| 9:42 | Goals for the Semantic Web |
| 10:51 | The Semantic Web |
| 12:26 | Comments on Semantic Web Languages |
| 13:01 | Current challenges |
| 20:20 | An OWL 2 Far ISWC 2008 panel |
| 20:29 | Dude, where’s my KR Language? |
| 22:20 | Has OWL won the KR wars? |
| 22:45 | An example with unmet needs |
| 24:16 | Another example with unmet needs |
| 25:15 | Let a couple of flowers bloom |
| 29:16 | AN OWL 2 FAR? |
| 29:29 | OWL(2) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (1) |
| 30:36 | OWL(2) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (2) |
| 30:44 | OWL(2) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (3) |
| 30:49 | OWL(2) QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (4) |
| 31:24 | OWL FALLACIES (1) |
| 31:33 | OWL FALLACIES (2) |
| 31:56 | OWL FALLACIES (3) |
| 32:18 | OWL FALLACIES (4) |
| 32:26 | OWL FALLACIES (5) |
| 32:37 | OWL FALLACIES (6) |
| 32:41 | CHOOSE HOPE OVER FEAR (1) |
| 33:17 | CHOOSE HOPE OVER FEAR (2) |
| 38:33 | OWL FALLACIES (4) |
| 42:37 | CHOOSE HOPE OVER FEAR (2) |
Lecture rating
| People found this lecture: | ||
| Worth seeing | ||
| because it is: | ||
| Valuable and informative | ||
| Well presented | ||
| Easily understandable | ||
| Acceptably recorded | ||
| You need to login to cast your vote. | ||
Report a problem or upload files
If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Related content
Visitors who watched this lecture also watched...
  2 comments
|
||||
3 comments
|
||||
Download slides:
Link this page
Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !
