Graph Construction and b-Matching for Semi-Supervised Learning
Description
Graph based semi-supervised learning (SSL)
methods play an increasingly important role
in practical machine learning systems. A
crucial step in graph based SSL methods
is the conversion of data into a weighted
graph. However, most of the SSL literature
focuses on developing label inference algorithms
without extensively studying the
graph building method and its effect on performance.
This article provides an empirical
study of leading semi-supervised methods
under a wide range of graph construction
algorithms. These SSL inference algorithms
include the Local and Global Consistency
(LGC) method, the Gaussian Random
Field (GRF) method, the Graph Transduction
via Alternating Minimization (GTAM)
method as well as other techniques. Several
approaches for graph construction, sparsification
and weighting are explored including
the popular k-nearest neighbors method
(kNN) and the b-matching method. As opposed
to the greedily constructed kNN graph,
the b-matched graph ensures each node in the
graph has the same number of edges and produces
a balanced or regular graph. Experimental
results on both artificial data and real
benchmark datasets indicate that b-matching
produces more robust graphs and therefore
provides significantly better prediction accuracy
without any significant change in computation
time.
| Slides | |
| 0:00 | Graph Construction and b-Matching for Semi-Supervised Learning (1) |
| 0:04 | Graph Construction and b-Matching for Semi-Supervised Learning (2) |
| 0:51 | Semi-Supervised Learning |
| 1:54 | Graph Based SSL |
| 3:30 | Graph Construction |
| 4:50 | Neighborhood Graphs |
| 6:26 | k-Nearest Neighbor Graphs |
| 7:34 | b-Matching Graphs (1) |
| 7:58 | b-Matching Graphs (2) |
| 9:30 | Bipartite 1-Matching |
| 10:34 | Bipartite b-Matching (1) |
| 11:14 | Bipartite b-Matching (2) |
| 12:05 | b-Matching (1) |
| 12:30 | b-Matching (2) |
| 13:02 | b-Matching (3) |
| 13:54 | Graph Weighting |
| 15:02 | Graph Labeling |
| 16:06 | Gaussian Random Fields |
| 16:40 | Local and Global Consistency |
| 17:06 | Graph Transduction via Alternating Minimization |
| 17:58 | Synthetic Experiments (1) |
| 19:22 | Synthetic Experiments (2) |
| 20:01 | Real Experiment Error Rates |
| 20:46 | Real Experiment Error Rates with More Labeling |
| 21:34 | Conclusions |
Lecture rating
| People found this lecture: | ||
| Worth seeing | ||
| because it is: | ||
| Valuable and informative | ||
| Well presented | ||
| Easily understandable | ||
| Acceptably recorded | ||
| You need to login to cast your vote. | ||
Report a problem or upload files
If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Related content
Link this page
Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !




