The Next Fifty Years of Science

author: Kevin Kelly, Wired Magazine

Description

The scientific method which provides us with so many technological goodies does not resemble the science of 1600. Ever since Bacon, science has undergone a slow evolution.

Landmarks in the history of the scientific method are the invention of libraries, indexes, citations, controlled experiments, peer review, placebos, double blind experiments, randomization, and search among others. At the core of the scientific method is the structuring of information. In the next 50 years, as the technologies of information and knowledge accelerate, the nature of the scientific process will change even more than it has in the last 400 years. We can't predict what specific inventions will arise in the next 50 years, but based on long-term trends in epistemic tools, I believe we can speculate on how the scientific method itself -- that is, how we know -- will change in the next five decades.

Categories

Top: Science

Lecture rating

People found this lecture:
Worth seeing
because it is:
 Valuable and informative
Well presented
Easily understandable
Acceptably recorded
You need to login to cast your vote.

Report a problem or upload files

If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.

 Watch video:   (click on thumbnail to launch)

Watch Part 1
Part 1 0:47:53

Link this page

Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !

Reviews and comments:

Comment1 nitin, August 31, 2007 at 12:33 p.m.:

this is the good site for sharing knowledge and information spreading.i like very much


Comment2 Waldo Hitcher, April 15, 2008 at 5:22 a.m.:

What do google do to frighten speakers? The ambiance, facilities, lighting, colour scheme etc are awful and stressing the presentation. Ruins an interesting point of view.

He loses the audience by not getting to the point. Like Kelly says "when are we going to have flying cars" is the real draw and you can't just wait for ten minutes then write this off.

Google need to watch CSI for how to engage an audience in a 45 min science talk.

Otherwise its interesting but all made up with little support and no academic rigour.

Key question not answered is what determines or directs the future of science, is it the random developments or is it the money. Does MIT, Cambridge and Oxford determine the future of science or Microsoft, DARPA, Glaxo, Dow, GE, Google etc


Comment3 lol, July 14, 2008 at 7:39 p.m.:

...yawn


Write your own review or comment: