Exploiting Information Extraction, Reasoning and Machine Learning for Relation Prediction

author: Xueyan Jiang, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität
published: July 4, 2012,   recorded: May 2012,   views: 410
Categories

Slides

Related content

Report a problem or upload files

If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Lecture popularity: You need to login to cast your vote.
  Delicious Bibliography

Description

The three most common approaches for deriving or predicting instantiated relations, i.e. triple statements (s, p, o), are information extraction, reasoning and relational machine learning. Information extraction uses sensory information, typically in form of text, and extracts statements using various methods ranging from simple classifiers to the most sophisticated NLP approaches. Logical reasoning is based on a set of true statements and derives new statements via inference using higher-order logical axioms. Finally, machine learning exploits regularities in the data to predict the likelihood of new statements. In this paper we combine all three methods to exploit all sources of available information in a modular way, by which we mean that each approach, i.e., information extraction, reasoning, machine learning, can be optimized independently to be combined in an overall system. For relational machine learning, we present a novel approach based on hierarchical Bayesian multi-label learning which also sheds new light on common factorization approaches. We rank the probabilities for statements to be true in the sense that: given that we are forced to make a decision, what is the best option. We consider the fact that an entity can belong to more than one ontological class and discuss aggregation. We extend the approach to modeling nonlinear dependencies between relationships and for personalization. We validate our model using data from the Yago and the DBpedia ontology.

See Also:

Download slides icon Download slides: eswc2012_jiang_relation_prediction_01.pdf (1.2¬†MB)


Help icon Streaming Video Help

Link this page

Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !

Reviews and comments:

Comment1 chriss M, August 1, 2012 at 11:47 p.m.:

karl may not karl mal ! :(


Comment2 Davor (Publication Manager at VideoLectures.Net), September 14, 2012 at 2:37 p.m.:

@chriss - please, give Xueyan a break, pronunciation is not an issue.

Write your own review or comment:

make sure you have javascript enabled or clear this field: