Where Does It Break? Or: Why the Semantic Web is Not Just 'Research as Usual'

author: Frank van Harmelen, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, VU University Amsterdam
published: Feb. 25, 2007,   recorded: June 2006,   views: 444
Categories

Related content

Report a problem or upload files

If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Lecture popularity: You need to login to cast your vote.
  Delicious Bibliography

Description

Work on the Semantic Web is all to often phrased as a technological challenge: how to improve the precision of search engines, how to personalise web-sites, how to integrate weakly-structured data-sources, etc. This suggests that we will be able to realise the Semantic Web by merely applying (and at most refining) the results that are already available from many branches of Computer Science.

I will argue in this talk that instead of (just) a technological challenge, the Semantic Web forces us to rethink the foundations of many subfields of Computer Science. This is certainly true for my own field (Knowledge Representation), where the challenge of the Semantic Web continues to break many often silently held and shared assumptions underlying decades of research. With some caution, I claim that this is also true for other fields, such as Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, Databases, and others. For each of these fields, I will try to identify silently held assumptions which are no longer true on the Semantic Web, prompting a radical rethink of many past results from these fields.

Link this page

Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !

Reviews and comments:

Comment1 tntht, June 24, 2008 at 11:12 a.m.:

Frank van Harmelen's viewpoint can be found at a Workshop(New forms of reasoning for the Semantic Web: scalable, tolerant and dynamic ),very excellent~

Write your own review or comment:

make sure you have javascript enabled or clear this field: