Structure and Dynamics in Complex Networks

author: Mark Newman, Department of Physics, University of Michigan
published: Nov. 29, 2007,   recorded: October 2007,   views: 4285

Related content

Report a problem or upload files

If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Lecture popularity: You need to login to cast your vote.
  Delicious Bibliography

Link this page

Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !

Reviews and comments:

Comment1 Padma Venu, March 2, 2009 at 8:11 a.m.:

Here i was unable to view the videolectures, so pls kindly look into the issue

Comment2 yohannes, October 29, 2009 at 1:46 p.m.:

very interesting and clear explanations.

Comment3 OK, December 13, 2009 at 4:23 a.m.:

in the jargon of the field .. compact mathematical representation .. is there any LESS F* compact representation of any "data" then a F* graph? .. maybe a NW? .. really think about it? .. REALLY THINK ABOUT IT?.. well but one page takes to you another page .. so no point getting worked up about that.. people tell you then you put an arrow .. but most of the NWs we study today do not come out looking like this, but like that .. however there is a catch .. most however come out looking like this . presumably because they were assuming that this would communicate something useful ? .. I certainly do not think so .. BUT YOU YOU YOU you have a solution .. for the masses? .. hmm .. OK so we agree BS BS lota BS with NWs .. SMALL WORLD EFFECT ??? F* TRAITOR!! I believed in you .. for about a F* minute.. a*h*lle .. kinda a clever one .. F* U .. U are a little cavalier about saying ANY F* thing .. waiting .. moreover roughly speaking you have a PENCHANT --oxford dictionary enough?-- so a PENCHANT for talking about trivial things while at the same F* time .. the MEAN SQUARED DEGREE NO? WHY? NO? maybe .. NO? .. naively .. so OK i think your perception of novelty is HIGHLY SKEWED .. I mean you procedd to a highly TRIVIAL point about epidemology on graphs .. as a function of being over 12 and having got over EULER and even runge and kuta .. nver f* mind

Write your own review or comment:

make sure you have javascript enabled or clear this field: