Dissecting the Canon: Visual Subject Co-Popularity Networks in Art Research

author: Maximilian Schich, CCNR - BarabásiLab, Physics Department, Northeastern University
published: Oct. 21, 2008,   recorded: August 2008,   views: 181
Categories

Slides

Related content

Report a problem or upload files

If you have found a problem with this lecture or would like to send us extra material, articles, exercises, etc., please use our ticket system to describe your request and upload the data.
Enter your e-mail into the 'Cc' field, and we will keep you updated with your request's status.
Lecture popularity: You need to login to cast your vote.
  Delicious Bibliography

Description

In Art History and Archaeology scholars use documents to study objects together with their meaning, related people, locations, times and events. Within this effort Art History has been defined as the 'history of all man-made things' (Kubler, 1962), which implies a focus on the dynamics of interrelated objects – the growth of what can be seen as the 'coral reef of culture' (Gombrich, 1979).

An important question in this domain is the definition or emergence of canon, i.e. the set of most popular objects, which everybody knows or supposedly should know in a given area – such as Da Vinci’s 'Mona Lisa' and Botticelli‘s 'Venus' in painting or the 'Colosseum' and the 'Pantheon' in architecture.

In our talk we show that canons are identical with the most popular items over a distribution of popularity, which happens to be highly heterogeneous. As a consequence we can explore the meaning of canon by looking at the co-popularity of visual objects in general, no matter if the objects belong to the head or the tail of the popularity distribution.

See Also:

Download slides icon Download slides: cvss08_schich_dtcvs_01.pdf (10.4 MB)


Help icon Streaming Video Help

Link this page

Would you like to put a link to this lecture on your homepage?
Go ahead! Copy the HTML snippet !

Write your own review or comment:

make sure you have javascript enabled or clear this field: