The original version of this video is unedited, unfortunately, and the technical problems are irritating. I wish that I had been more specific and less nervous at the time, but experience certainly makes one a better presenter. I'd be happy to answer question that folk might have on complexity per se and to offer corrections to erroneous 'suggestions' that might have arisen in this presentation.

The marrying of hard systems with soft-systems is never an easy one (if at all possible); the idea that "trust" as a subjective experience can be captured by parameters of informational interaction, or even simple communicative patterns is naive. It is naive, especially, without the positing of an embodied form of interaction, or some 'grounding' that resides in the physiological parameters/emotional variables that one could use as indications thereof.

One of the things I enjoy most about learning and research is the certainty that one changes one's notions as a result of the activities of research and that with time and care one is able to provide higher resolution ideas to answers given as refutations earlier in one's career.