Sign inSign up
Strategic Impatience in Go/NoGo versus Forced-Choice Decision-Making thumbnail
Pause
Mute
Subtitles
Playback speed
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
1.25
1.5
1.75
2
Full screen

Strategic Impatience in Go/NoGo versus Forced-Choice Decision-Making

Published on Jan 16, 20134881 Views

Angela J. Yu

Two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) and Go/NoGo (GNG) tasks are behavioral choice paradigms commonly used to study sensory and cognitive processing in choice behavior. While GNG is thought to isolate

NIPS Conference 2012 - Lake Tahoe

Related categories

Neuroscience Cognitive Science

Chapter list

Strategic Impatience in Go/NoGo vs. Forced-Choice Decision-Making 00:00
How do We Make Decisions? (1)00:26
How do We Make Decisions? (2)00:49
Decision-Making in Psychology (1)02:02
Decision-Making in Psychology (2)03:23
Decision-Making in Psychology (3)03:41
Go Bias in GNG Tasks04:23
Model: Bayes-Optimal Markov Decision Process05:45
Model Details07:10
Optimal Decision Threshold and Go Bias 08:21
Model Reproduces Go Bias09:38
Prediction: Influence of Prior Expectation10:11
Model Prediction: Influence of Deadline (1)10:51
Model Prediction: Influence of Deadline (2)11:34
Relationship to Drift-diffusion models11:49
DDMs fit to optimal model simulations12:49
Summary & Discussion13:31