Is the Semantic Web what we expected? Adoption Patterns and Content-driven Challenges thumbnail
slide-image
Pause
Mute
Subtitles not available
Playback speed
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
1.25
1.5
1.75
2
Full screen

Is the Semantic Web what we expected? Adoption Patterns and Content-driven Challenges

Published on Nov 10, 20162749 Views

Semantic Web technologies, such as Linked Data and Schema.org, are used by a significant number of websites to support the automated processing of their content. In the talk, I will contrast the origi

Related categories

Chapter list

Is the Semantic Web what we Expected?00:00
Ian‘s Keynote Last Year in Bethlehem00:49
This Year01:27
Outline01:46
1. What did we expect the Semantic Web to be?02:28
2001 Article: The Semantic Web02:34
Expectation: Hyperlinks are Set on Data Level03:05
Expectation: High Quality Content / Provenance Metadata03:52
Check List: Our Expectations about the Semantic Web04:37
2. What does the Semantic Web actually look like?04:58
2.1 Linked Data Deployment05:22
Ontological Agreement06:31
RDF Links07:20
Cool Applications - 107:58
2.2 HTML-embedded Data08:56
Overall Adoption 201509:23
Number of PLDs providing HTML-embedded Data 10:50
Widely-used Classes12:04
Adoption by E-Commerce Websites13:04
Properties used to Describe Products13:39
Challenge: Small Amount of Identifiers and Data Links14:32
Challenge: Flat Data Structures15:45
Challenge: Product Categorization16:55
Adoption by Travel Websites18:26
Properties used to Describe Hotels19:05
Adoption by Job Portals19:41
Properties used to Describe Job Postings19:53
Cool Applications - 220:20
Cool Applications - 321:01
Our Expectations Revisited21:34
Why is this the Case?21:58
Benefits and Costs for Data Providers24:53
Benefits of Publishing HTML-Embedded Data25:32
Effort for Publishing HTML-Embedded Data26:01
Effort for Setting Data Links28:02
For Whom does the Linking Effort pay off?29:31
Effort of Maintaining Links31:53
Hypothesis33:36
4. What does this mean for Semantic Web Applications? - 134:08
4. What does this mean for Semantic Web Applications? - 234:16
Applications should be happy about …34:37
Semantic Web Clients need to be FAT Clients35:48
Parsing Flat Descriptions36:55
Create and Verify Data Links38:11
Resolve Data Conflicts39:54
Google Knowledge Vault41:15
The Structural Continuum42:08
Exploit Schema.org and HTML Tables Together42:35
Conclusions43:12
The Semantic Web is Huge43:14
We will keep on seeing Similar Adoption Patterns44:32
Semantic Web Clients need to be FAT Clients44:49