About
In recent years we have witnessed tremendous interest and substantial economic exploitation of search technologies, both at web and enterprise scale. However, the representation of user queries and resource content in existing search appliances is still almost exclusively achieved by simple syntax‐based descriptions of the resource content and the information need such as in the predominant keyword-centric paradigm (i.e. keyword queries matched against bag‐of‐words document representation).
On the other hand, recent advances in the field of semantic technologies have resulted in tools and standards that allow for the articulation of domain knowledge in a formal manner at a high level of expressivity. At the same time, semantic repositories and reasoning engines have only now advanced to a state where querying and processing of this knowledge can scale to realistic IR scenarios.
In parallel to these developments, in the past years we have also seen the emergence of important results in adapting ideas from IR to the problem of search in RDF/OWL data, folksonomies, microformat collections or semantically tagged natural text. Common to these scenarios is that the search is focused not on a document collection, but on metadata (which may be possibly linked to or embedded in textual information). Search and ranking in metadata stores is another key topic addressed by the workshop.
As such, semantic technologies are now in a state to provide significant contributions to IR problems. In this context, several challenges arise for Semantic Search systems. These include, among others:
* How can semantic technologies be exploited to capture the information need of the user?
* How can the information need of the user be translated to expressive formal queries without enforcing the user to be capable of handling the difficult query syntax?
* How can expressive resource descriptions be extracted (acquired) from documents (users)?
* How can expressive resource descriptions be stored and queried efficiently on a large scale?
* How can vague information needs and incomplete resource descriptions be handled?
* How can semantic search systems be evaluated and compared with standard IR systems?
Related categories
Uploaded videos:
Introduction to Semantic Search 2009
May 27, 2009
·
4017 Views
Correlator: things we did, things we should do, and things we don't know how to
May 27, 2009
·
3496 Views
Investigating the Demand Side of Semantic Search through Query Log Analysis
May 27, 2009
·
2998 Views
Semantic Search for Enterprise 2.0
May 27, 2009
·
3578 Views
Improving search results with lightweight semantic search: discussion paper
May 27, 2009
·
3200 Views
Wanderlust: Extracting Semantic Relations from Natural Language Text Using Depen...
May 27, 2009
·
5131 Views
Towards ECSSE: live Web of Data search and integration
May 27, 2009
·
3070 Views
Story Link Detection with Entity Resolution
May 27, 2009
·
4207 Views
Retrieval and Ranking of Semantic Entities for Enterprise Knowledge Management T...
May 27, 2009
·
3175 Views
P2P Concept Search: Some Preliminary Results
May 27, 2009
·
2816 Views
Question Answering Based on Semantic Graphs
May 27, 2009
·
5993 Views
Relevance Feedback Between Hypertext and Semantic Search
May 27, 2009
·
3575 Views
Using TREC for cross-comparison between classic IR and ontology-based search mod...
May 27, 2009
·
4269 Views
Searching and ranking in RDF documents and social networks
May 27, 2009
·
3659 Views
Discussion and Closing
May 27, 2009
·
2718 Views